Ganemos solicita que la Diputación sancione a la empresa Berkeley por hacer obras en la carretera sin autorización
Ganemos requests that the Diputación sanctions the Berkeley company for carrying out works on the highway without authorization
Las actuaciones ilegales de Berkeley Minera España S.L. en el término municipal de Retortillo obligan a la Diputación de Salamanca a la resolución del convenio de colaboración firmado entre esta institución y la empresa minera para la construcción de una variante de la carretera comarcal SA-322, tal y como se explica desde Ganemos Salamanca.
El diputado de Ganemos Salamanca, Gabriel de la Mora, solicita que, ante la “inactividad” del Ayuntamiento de Retortillo, la Diputación rescinda el convenio firmado, inicie el procedimiento de restauración de la legalidad y sancione a la empresa responsable de la mina de uranio a cielo abierto
Además, “la inactividad del Ayuntamiento de Retortillo en todo lo que afecta a la empresa minera debe conllevar la admisión, por parte de la Diputación, de las competencias que no son desempeñadas por ese ayuntamiento, que se escuda en el argumento de la falta de medios materiales y humanos”, según detalla el diputado de Ganemos, Gabriel de la Mora.
Una obra realizada sin autorizaciones
La cláusula segunda del convenio entre la empresa y la Diputación estipula que Berkeley debe “solicitar y disponer de cuantas autorizaciones y licencias sean necesarias para la ejecución de la obra”. Además, tanto el arquitecto de la Mancomunidad de las Dehesas como la Comisión Territorial de Medio Ambiente y Urbanismo de Salamanca consideran que para la realización de las obras acometidas por Berkeley, la empresa debe contar con la Autorización de cambio de uso excepcional en suelo rústico y la Licencia Urbanística. “Pero Berkeley ejecutó las obras de la variante sin dichas autorizaciones”, denuncia De la Mora.
Una balsa construida sin Licencia Urbanística
Asimismo, el Servicio de Protección de la Naturaleza de la Guardia Civil afirma, en su informe de enero de 2017, que las obras ejecutadas por Berkeley son en realidad “la construcción de una balsa para que debía contar previamente con la Licencia Urbanística necesaria”. En el momento de realización de esas obras, Berkely carecía de ella, motivo por el cual realiza un informe denuncia que envía al Ayuntamiento de Retortillo.
Esta actuación de Berkeley “al margen de la ley” tuvo como consecuencia que el Ayuntamiento de Retortillo emitiera una Resolución de Alcaldía, de fecha 17 de febrero, de restauración de la legalidad urbanística, “por la que se ordenaba la paralización de las obras que se estaban ejecutando sin los oportunos permisos y se abría un expediente sancionador a la empresa minera, del que ahora tenemos conocimiento que ha caducado al no haber sido resuelto”, señala el diputado de Ganemos.
En el Informe del Servicio Jurídico de Asistencia a Municipios de la Diputación del 31 de enero de 2018 se establece la necesidad de que el Ayuntamiento de Retortillo emita una nueva Resolución para llevar a cabo la restauración de la legalidad urbanística, ya que la dictada en febrero de 2017 es considera nula de pleno derecho.
Ante los antecedentes, Ganemos hace hincapié en dos conclusiones:
BERKELEY INCUMPLE EL CONVENIO.- La actuación de Berkeley al margen de la legalidad supone un “incumplimiento flagrante” del convenio firmado con la Diputación, lo que conlleva la resolución del mismo, tal y como se estipula en su cláusula 6ª. Esta establece como motivo de finalización del compromiso contraído “el incumplimiento de la otra parte de lo estipulado en el presente convenio”. Además, al ejecutar las obras sin licencia se vulnera también la cláusula 2ª, por lo que se deben iniciar los trámites para resolver el convenio firmado entre esta institución y Berkeley el 19 de septiembre de 2016 para la construcción de la variante de la carretera SA-322.
LA DIPUTACIÓN DEBE ACTUAR.- La Diputación de Salamanca debe ejercer las competencias que le asigna el artículo 366 del Reglamento de Urbanismo de Castilla y León (Decreto 22/2004, de 29 de enero), y asumir las obligaciones de restauración de la legalidad urbanística que no ha ejercido el Ayuntamiento de Retortillo “por falta de medios materiales y humanos”.
Por todo ello, se debe proceder al inicio de un expediente de restauración de la legalidad urbanística y otro sancionador a la empresa minera antes de que prescriban las acciones ilegales ejecutadas por Berkeley en su proyecto de mina de uranio en la provincia de Salamanca, tal y como se señala en el informe del Servicio de Asistencia Jurídica a Municipios. “Es inconcebible que año y medio después de realizar unas las obras ilegalmente no se hayan precintado las mismas, ni tampoco se hayan retirado los materiales y maquinaria utilizados en ellas, en contra de lo estipulado en el artículo 344 del Reglamento de Urbanismo”, asevera el diputado de Ganemos Salamanca.
Ganemos requests that the Diputación sanctions the Berkeley company for carrying out works on the highway without authorization
The illegal actions of Berkeley Minera España S.L. in the municipality of Retortillo, the Diputación de Salamanca is obligated to the resolution of the collaboration agreement signed between this institution and the mining company for the construction of a variant of the regional road SA-322, as explained from Ganemos Salamanca.
The deputy of Ganemos Salamanca, Gabriel de la Mora, requested that, before the "inactivity" of the City Council of Retortillo, the County Council rescinded the signed agreement, start the procedure of restoration of legality and sanction the company responsible for the uranium mine open sky
In addition, "the inactivity of the City Council of Retortillo in everything that affects the mining company should lead to the admission, by the County Council, of the powers that are not performed by that municipality, which is behind the argument of the lack of material and human means ", according to the deputy of Ganemos, Gabriel de la Mora.
The deputy of Ganemos Salamanca, Gabriel de la Mora, requested that, before the "inactivity" of the City Council of Retortillo, the County Council rescinded the signed agreement, start the procedure of restoration of legality and sanction the company responsible for the uranium mine open sky
In addition, "the inactivity of the City Council of Retortillo in everything that affects the mining company should lead to the admission, by the County Council, of the powers that are not performed by that municipality, which is behind the argument of the lack of material and human means ", according to the deputy of Ganemos, Gabriel de la Mora.
A work done without authorizations
The second clause of the agreement between the company and the Diputación stipulates that Berkeley must "request and dispose of as many authorizations and licenses as are necessary for the execution of the work." In addition, both the architect of the Commonwealth of the Dehesas and the Territorial Commission of Environment and Urbanism of Salamanca consider that for the realization of the works undertaken by Berkeley, the company must have the authorization of change of exceptional use on rustic land and the Urban License. "But Berkeley executed the works of the variant without these authorizations", De la Mora denounces.
A raft built without an Urban License
Likewise, the Nature Protection Service of the Civil Guard affirms, in its report of January 2017, that the works executed by Berkeley are in fact "the construction of a raft so that it must previously have the necessary Urban License". At the time of these works, Berkely lacked it, which is why he makes a report that he sends to the City Council of Retortillo.
The second clause of the agreement between the company and the Diputación stipulates that Berkeley must "request and dispose of as many authorizations and licenses as are necessary for the execution of the work." In addition, both the architect of the Commonwealth of the Dehesas and the Territorial Commission of Environment and Urbanism of Salamanca consider that for the realization of the works undertaken by Berkeley, the company must have the authorization of change of exceptional use on rustic land and the Urban License. "But Berkeley executed the works of the variant without these authorizations", De la Mora denounces.
A raft built without an Urban License
Likewise, the Nature Protection Service of the Civil Guard affirms, in its report of January 2017, that the works executed by Berkeley are in fact "the construction of a raft so that it must previously have the necessary Urban License". At the time of these works, Berkely lacked it, which is why he makes a report that he sends to the City Council of Retortillo.
This action by Berkeley "outside the law" had as a consequence that the City Council of Retortillo issued a resolution of the Mayor's Office, dated February 17, to restore urban legality, "ordering the paralysis of the works that they were running without the appropriate permits and a sanctioning file was opened to the mining company, which we now know has expired because it has not been resolved, "says Ganemos's deputy.
In the Report of the Legal Service of Assistance to Municipalities of the Diputación of January 31, 2018 establishes the need for the City Council of Retortillo to issue a new Resolution to carry out the restoration of urban legality, since the one issued in February of 2017 is considered null and void.
Given the background, Ganemos emphasizes two conclusions:
BERKELEY FAILS TO FOLLOW THE AGREEMENT.- Berkeley's actions outside the legality are a "flagrant breach" of the agreement signed with the Provincial Council, which entails the resolution thereof, as stipulated in clause 6. This establishes as a reason for termination of the commitment contracted "the breach of the other party of what is stipulated in this agreement." In addition, when executing the works without a license, the 2nd clause is also violated, so the procedures must be initiated to resolve the agreement signed between this institution and Berkeley on September 19, 2016 for the construction of the highway variant SA- 322.
THE DIPUTATION SHOULD ACT.- The Diputación de Salamanca must exercise the powers assigned to it by article 366 of the Urban Planning Regulation of Castilla y León (Decree 22/2004, of January 29), and assume the obligations of restoration of urban legality that the City Council of Retortillo has not exercised "due to lack of material and human resources".
Therefore, we must proceed with the initiation of a restoration of the urban legality and another sanction to the mining company before prescribing the illegal actions executed by Berkeley in its uranium mine project in the province of Salamanca, such and as indicated in the report of the Legal Aid Service to Municipalities. "It is inconceivable that a year and a half after carrying out the works illegally, they have not been sealed, nor have the materials and machinery used in them been removed, contrary to what is stipulated in Article 344 of the Town Planning Regulation," he asserts. the deputy of Ganemos Salamanca.
In the Report of the Legal Service of Assistance to Municipalities of the Diputación of January 31, 2018 establishes the need for the City Council of Retortillo to issue a new Resolution to carry out the restoration of urban legality, since the one issued in February of 2017 is considered null and void.
Given the background, Ganemos emphasizes two conclusions:
BERKELEY FAILS TO FOLLOW THE AGREEMENT.- Berkeley's actions outside the legality are a "flagrant breach" of the agreement signed with the Provincial Council, which entails the resolution thereof, as stipulated in clause 6. This establishes as a reason for termination of the commitment contracted "the breach of the other party of what is stipulated in this agreement." In addition, when executing the works without a license, the 2nd clause is also violated, so the procedures must be initiated to resolve the agreement signed between this institution and Berkeley on September 19, 2016 for the construction of the highway variant SA- 322.
THE DIPUTATION SHOULD ACT.- The Diputación de Salamanca must exercise the powers assigned to it by article 366 of the Urban Planning Regulation of Castilla y León (Decree 22/2004, of January 29), and assume the obligations of restoration of urban legality that the City Council of Retortillo has not exercised "due to lack of material and human resources".
Therefore, we must proceed with the initiation of a restoration of the urban legality and another sanction to the mining company before prescribing the illegal actions executed by Berkeley in its uranium mine project in the province of Salamanca, such and as indicated in the report of the Legal Aid Service to Municipalities. "It is inconceivable that a year and a half after carrying out the works illegally, they have not been sealed, nor have the materials and machinery used in them been removed, contrary to what is stipulated in Article 344 of the Town Planning Regulation," he asserts. the deputy of Ganemos Salamanca.
Es la manera que desistan de explotar los campo charros, denuncia denuncia.....
ResponderEliminarNo, nos vamos a cansar de decir fuera Berkley.